Logo Voyage

User talk:SHB2000 Voyage Tips and guide

You can check the original Wikivoyage article Here
This is the talk page of SHB2000

General

  • If you need help with anything at all, please leave a message right here on this talk page.
  • If there's something you need to discuss in private, email me in strictest confidence. Need to be autoconfirmed though, if not go and message me on a random WMF project that no one would ever be thinking of going to if you're not autoconfirmed (list of wikis here).
  • Feeling bored and want to have a chat, I'm more than happy to do so.
  • If you're having difficulty in accessing this talk page, go to b:User talk:SHB2000 or m:User talk:SHB2000. I check both talk pages frequently and get notifications on both. However, do not go to my English Wikipedia talk page. The English Wikipedia is not the centre of all WMF projects.
  • This page is also protected often due to the result of x-wiki vandals and long-term abusers. If that's the case, then go to my Meta-Wiki talk page.
  • The reply tool may not work on this page.
  • Rollbacks used (for personal reference)
  • I'm open to technical questions here, but at the same time, you may also get a better response at the travellers' pub.
  • Inquiries about my global sysop actions should preferably go on my Meta-Wiki talk page.

Archives

Main archives (current archive)

Other archives (mostly defunct nowadays)

  • Pub archive – all discussions swept from the pub
  • Barncompass archive – all barncompasses here (although I do have another copy of this on my userpage)

Docent

  • If you're here to ask me a docent question, then this is the place. Expect a reply within 1–7 days, unless you see a box saying that I'm travelling.
  • If this page is protected, then follow the same instructions for anons (or IP users) and go to my IP talk page or my Meta talk page.

Click here to message me – I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page. Do be aware though, that I do not use talkback. I do on the other hand, use pings as I've more or less given up on watchlists, but may not always ping you (usually, if the message has gone unanswered for about more than 12-18 hours, then I'd usually give a ping).

Threads on this page are archived every 14 days of inactivity, but mass mail messages may get archived earlier, while active threads might get archived later than 14 days of inactivity, but how this page is archived isn't consistent merely because a bot couldn't do its job.


Table of contents


Reverted my edits for no reason

[edit]

Whyd you revert my north korea edits?

Because it wasn't a helpful change. Need I say anything more? //shb (t | c | m) 22:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: September 2025

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 12:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Checkuser?

[edit]

I don't know how people are nominated for local checkuser, but given recent events I think we really need one. You're very active here and already a bureaucrat, so I think it would make sense for you to have the tools. Would you be interested? I don't want to make a nomination without consulting you first. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 20:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I would be interested (and thanks for asking!) – I believe it's the same process as starting a nomination on WV:URN, except we need 25 support votes and m:ANPDP needs to be signed. We'd also need a minimum of two checkusers, so maybe would you be happy to put yourself down as the second? //shb (t | c | m) 21:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Some other thoughts that come to mind:
  • it might be very difficult to reach 25 votes organically, so there is a non-zero chance of our nominations failing without any opposes
  • it's probs worth revising Wikivoyage:CheckUser to explicitly allow stewards to continue performing checks here even after we obtain local checkusers
Nonetheless I still think it's worth trying, especially because I've had to ask a fair few CU requests (mostly off-wiki via Discord) this year and it isn't like the amount of abuse has gone down. //shb (t | c | m) 22:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would be happy to, but I wouldn't want to stand in the way of any bureaucrats who may be interested. I think it's worth trying a nomination even if finding 25 users is difficult. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 23:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Definitely; if anything there is nothing saying we can't have 3 CUs either (which would ideally be better than two). //shb (t | c | m) 00:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Friends

[edit]

Can we please be friends with you? I want to be your friend. ~2025-28933-90 (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

No. //shb (t | c | m) 21:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's newspaper
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)


Discover



Powered by GetYourGuide